The law firm of Bhangal & Virk defend all criminal and quasi-criminal matters. We have the requisite experience in representing and defending the rights of those who have been charged with any crime. The counsel and representation provided by our firm is crucial to a client's legal case. We know the laws, proceedings, and customs that apply to your case and how to use those to best serve your legal interests. Recent Success R. v. V.J. Case - Our client was charged with having possession of 20 grams of Marihuana. Our client readily admitted that he had possession of the drugs, but wanted us to do everything we could to try to win the case. Trial - The Crown attempted to prove that the drugs were in fact Marihuana by relying upon a Certificate of Analysis as they commonly do. The Certificate was served upon our client's mother at our client's home. I brought to the attention of the Crown that service was flawed as our client never actually received the Certificate evidence. As a result the Crown decided to withdraw the charges against our client R. v. P.D. Case - Our client was apprehended with a small quantity of Marihuana. He was a University Graduate and held a very responsible job. I brought to the attention of the Crown the details about our client and the fact that a Criminal Record would adversely affect his employment situation. The Crown agreed that upon the making of a charitable donation the charges would be withdrawn. Result - Charges were withdrawn. R. v. T.S. Case - The police had stopped our client's car because it had a loud muffler. The police officer became suspicious of our client as he appeared very nervous. The officer asked him if he could search the car. Our client felt he didn't have a choice and simply let the police search the vehicle. The police officer located $400.00 worth of cocaine and $150.00 worth of Marihuana. Trial - It was argued that the police had no authority to search the vehicle. The consent that the police relied upon was not an informed consent. Our client was unfairly treated in the manner in which the vehicle was stopped and subsequently searched. Result - The Court held that our client's Charter Rights had been violated and dismissed the charges.